Current:Home > reviewsColorado Supreme Court bans Trump from the state’s ballot under Constitution’s insurrection clause -CapitalWay
Colorado Supreme Court bans Trump from the state’s ballot under Constitution’s insurrection clause
View
Date:2025-04-14 21:03:09
DENVER (AP) — The Colorado Supreme Court on Tuesday declared former President Donald Trump ineligible for the White House under the U.S. Constitution’s insurrection clause and removed him from the state’s presidential primary ballot, setting up a likely showdown in the nation’s highest court to decide whether the front-runner for the GOP nomination can remain in the race.
The decision from a court whose justices were all appointed by Democratic governors marks the first time in history that Section 3 of the 14th Amendment has been used to disqualify a presidential candidate.
“A majority of the court holds that Trump is disqualified from holding the office of president under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment,” the court wrote in its 4-3 decision.
Colorado’s highest court overturned a ruling from a district court judge who found that Trump incited an insurrection for his role in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol, but said he could not be barred from the ballot because it was unclear that the provision was intended to cover the presidency.
The court stayed its decision until Jan. 4, or until the U.S. Supreme Court rules on the case.
“We do not reach these conclusions lightly,” wrote the court’s majority. “We are mindful of the magnitude and weight of the questions now before us. We are likewise mindful of our solemn duty to apply the law, without fear or favor, and without being swayed by public reaction to the decisions that the law mandates we reach.”
Trump’s attorneys had promised to appeal any disqualification immediately to the nation’s highest court, which has the final say about constitutional matters. His campaign said it was working on a response to the ruling.
Trump lost Colorado by 13 percentage points in 2020 and doesn’t need the state to win next year’s presidential election. But the danger for the former president is that more courts and election officials will follow Colorado’s lead and exclude Trump from must-win states.
Colorado officials say the issue must be settled by Jan. 5, the deadline for the state to print its presidential primary ballots.
Dozens of lawsuits have been filed nationally to disqualify Trump under Section 3, which was designed to keep former Confederates from returning to government after the Civil War. It bars from office anyone who swore an oath to “support” the Constitution and then “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” against it, and has been used only a handful of times since the decade after the Civil War.
The Colorado case is the first where the plaintiffs succeeded. After a weeklong hearing in November, District Judge Sarah B. Wallace found that Trump indeed had “engaged in insurrection” by inciting the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, and her ruling that kept him on the ballot was a fairly technical one.
Trump’s attorneys convinced Wallace that, because the language in Section 3 refers to “officers of the United States” who take an oath to “support” the Constitution, it must not apply to the president, who is not included as an “officer of the United States” elsewhere in the document and whose oath is to “preserve, protect and defend” the Constitution.
The provision also says offices covered include senator, representative, electors of the president and vice president, and all others “under the United States,” but doesn’t name the presidency.
The state’s highest court didn’t agree, siding with attorneys for six Colorado Republican and unaffiliated voters who argued that it was nonsensical to imagine the framers of the amendment, fearful of former Confederates returning to power, would bar them from low-level offices but not the highest one in the land.
“You’d be saying a rebel who took up arms against the government couldn’t be a county sheriff, but could be the president,” attorney Jason Murray said in arguments before the court in early December.
veryGood! (218)
Related
- Don't let hackers fool you with a 'scam
- Netflix’s Seven Husbands of Evelyn Hugo Movie Reveals Fiery New Details
- Protecting Mexico’s Iconic Salamander Means Saving one of the Country’s Most Important Wetlands
- AI-generated deepfakes are moving fast. Policymakers can't keep up
- See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
- Inside Clean Energy: Who’s Ahead in the Race for Offshore Wind Jobs in the US?
- Amazon Reviewers Keep Coming Back to Shop These Cute, Comfy & On-Sale Summer Pants
- Inside the Murder Case Against a Utah Mom Who Wrote a Book on Grief After Her Husband's Sudden Death
- North Carolina trustees approve Bill Belichick’s deal ahead of introductory news conference
- Charlie Puth Blasts Trend of Throwing Objects at Performers After Kelsea Ballerini's Onstage Incident
Ranking
- Meta releases AI model to enhance Metaverse experience
- Biden Could Score a Climate Victory in a Single Word: Plastics
- GOP governor says he's urged Fox News to break out of its 'echo chamber'
- Cynthia Nixon Weighs In On Chances of Kim Cattrall Returning for More And Just Like That Episodes
- Bill Belichick's salary at North Carolina: School releases football coach's contract details
- 10 Trendy Amazon Jewelry Finds You'll Want to Wear All the Time
- Zac Efron Shares Rare Photo With Little Sister Olivia and Brother Henry During the Greatest Circus Trip
- Former WWE Star Darren Drozdov Dead at 54
Recommendation
'Most Whopper
City and State Officials Continue Searching for the Cause of Last Week’s E. Coli Contamination of Baltimore’s Water
When your boss is an algorithm
Can forcing people to save cool inflation?
Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
Amy Schumer Crashes Joy Ride Cast's Press Junket in the Most Epic Way
Noah Cyrus Shares How Haters Criticizing Her Engagement Reminds Her of Being Suicidal at Age 11
Inside Clean Energy: Taking Stock of the Energy Storage Boom Happening Right Now